PERM Audits

How to Respond to a PERM Audit

The Certifying Officer (CO) at the PERM Processing Center can request an audit of any permanent labor certification application, either based on flagged answers or a random selection.

The following common issues in flagged answer audits:

  • Alien has an ownership interest in the employer or a family relationship with the employer (C9)
  • Employer has less than 10 employees (C5)
  • The job requirements have a foreign language requirement (H13)
  • Job requirements for the occupation are beyond what is considered “normal” for the same or related occupations (H12)
  • Alien gained his experience with the petitioning employer or received payment for education from the employer (J21 and J22)
  • There are strikes, lockouts and/or layoffs in the same or related occupation (I-24 through I-26)
  • The alien has experience in an alternate occupation (H10)
  • The job opportunity includes a combination of occupations (H15)
  • Employer received payment of any kind for the PERM application from alien (I-23)

If a PERM application is selected for audit, the employer will receive an audit letter that specifically states the additional documentation to be submitted, and establishes a date (30 days from the date of the audit letter) for submission of the required documentation, and advises that the application will be denied if the required information is not received by the deadline.

The employer is required to submit all requested documents to the CO by mail or commercial delivery service (FedEx (UPS) prior to the deadline.

If the employer does not respond to the audit request prior to the deadline, the petition will be denied.

As a consequence of not responding, the employer may be required to conduct “supervised recruitment” for any future labor certification filings for up to two years.

The CO may grant the employer one extension of up to 30 days after the initial 30 day period in which to respond to the audit letter.

After receipt of the response from the employer, if the CO determines that the documentation is complete and consistent with responses on the ETA 9089, then the PERM petition will be certified (approved).

If the documentation is deemed deficient by the CO, the PERM petition will be denied.

The CO may also request additional documentation or order that the employer conduct supervised recruitment.

The DOL regulations state that an application cannot be withdrawn once it has been selected for audit.

A normal audit response will include:

  • The Audit request.
  • The signed and dated ETA 9089 (post filing version with the case # on the bottom).
  • The Prevailing Wage Determination.
  • The completed and signed Notice of Filing.
  • The completed and signed Recruitment Report.
  • Copies of all resumes from applicants referenced in the recruitment report.
  • Clear copies of each advertisement referenced in the ETA 9089.

We normally recommend that the employer use a commercial service such as FedEx or UPS so that you have proof of receipt by the DOL.

From PERM FAQ’s 10:

Can the employer submit alternative evidence in the absence of primary evidence in response to an audit request?

Under the procedures outlined in 20 CFR 656.20, in response to an audit, employers must present the required documentation.

The documentary evidence the regulations require the employer to maintain in its compliance file is what is sought in an audit request.

For example, the use of an employer’s web site is to be documented by dated copies of pages from that site advertising the occupation involved in the application.

However, if the employer does not have the primary evidence suggested by the regulation, it may attempt to satisfy the request through the use of alternative evidence not specifically listed in 656.17.

In the case of the employer’s web site, in the absence of a copy of the posting, the employer may provide an affidavit from the official within the employer’s organization responsible for the posting of such occupations on the web site attesting, under penalty of perjury, to the posting of the job.

Whether such evidence will be accepted depends upon the nature of the submission and the presence of other primary documentation.

The more primary evidence is not provided, the more likely the audit response will be found to be non-responsive.

Client Reviews

  • Excellent service provided by the Team and every step of the way was very accurate and guidance was brilliant , we use USAVISANOW for our Companies Immigration needs , will recommend to every one.
    ★★★★★
  • After searching for an attorney/firm to prepare my NIW case I came across Marc’s website (usavisanow.com). I was immediately struck by how responsive they were, often answering my detailed questions within an hour. It took about 4 weeks from start the process to filing with USCIS – mostly because of the time it took me to obtain the reference / recommendation letters…
    ★★★★★
  • The Green Card process, or any immigration petition for that matter, can be a very daunting, stressful and confusing process for applicants. Thanks to Marc and his team, my experience (for both my Green Card application from start to finish, and H1B transfer from my former to my current employer) was none of those things.
    ★★★★★
  • I worked with Taylor and Associates Law P.C. on two separate cases — an H1B work visa and a marriage green card — and was very pleased with the high-level of service they provided. The visa process is very overwhelming, but my case manager, Mr. Dorer, made both processes easy and efficient because he is informative and is always quick to respond to my questions in a timely manner.
    ★★★★★
  • Marc Taylor and his team have been excellent in preparing and following-up on our case in a timely manner. The team has been prompt in filing all the paper work for the Green card for my husband. They answered every question I had (and I had a lot of questions!) quickly and clearly. I have already recommended their services to my friend who is getting married next month. Thank you for making this process seem easy!
    ★★★★★
  • We decided to go with Marc for our K-1 visa, for my fiance and son. Marc and his incredible team was an invaluable resource for us in uniting our family. I want to additionally extend my warmest regards and thanks to John for his patience and unwavering support! Thank you all so very much!
    ★★★★★
  • Have been using Marc Taylor’s services, usavisanow.com for a few years. Mr. Taylor provided assistance and guided us through many steps: from the initial H1B visa application all the way to the employment based Green Card. Very professional and quick to respond to our inquiries. The website is easy to use. Very convenient to send documents and track the progress of your application. Office employees are also very helpful and responsive.
    ★★★★★
  • My marriage based permanent residence case was prepared professionally and filed quickly. They responded to my emails in a very detailed and timely manner. The whole process was done online. They kept me updated about my case status during the whole process. Thank you Marc and your team for helping me through this process and not charging me thousands of dollars like some other lawyers.
    ★★★★★

Read More Client Reviews